Explanatory わけだ

Explanatory わけだ

Last time, you learned how to express doubts in various ways, e.g. “日に本ほん語ごは難むずかしいのかな (I wonder if the Japanese language is difficult),” and “日に本ほん語ごは簡単かんたんなんじゃないか (I suppose the Japanese language is easy).” As you can see, the explanatory のだ often appears in a lot of sentence patterns to give some nuances. In this lesson, you will learn a related expression わけだ.

Explanation for How the Explanatory わけだ Works

The origin of わけだ comes from the kanji 訳わけ which means “reason,” “cause,” and “meaning.” Thus, it’s sometimes written in kanji like this 訳わけだ, but usually the hiragana version is preferred. The essential function of the explanatory わけだ is the same as the explanatory のだ, which is to contextually connect two sentences like “漢かん字じは勉べん強きょうしたくない。難むずかしいんだ。 (As for kanji, I don’t want to study it because it’s difficult).” Let’s check what わけだ can express in detail.

Conjugation Rule

先生せんせいなわけ(だ / です)
元げん気きなわけ(だ / です)
若わかいわけ(だ / です)
走はしるわけ(だ / です)

The conjugation of わけだ is very simple. Just like のだ, you can directly attach わけだ to i-adjectives and verbs. For nouns and na-adjectives, you add な.

先生せんせいなわけだから、
先生せんせいなわけなので、
先生せんせいなわけで、

When you make compound sentences, you will conjugate the last だ of わけだ. The explanatory わけだ sometimes appears in subordinate clauses.

Affirmative Sentences

Conclusions Based on a Guess

ロケットが爆発ばくはつ(した / しました) 実験じっけん は失敗しっぱいしたわけ(だ / です)
Condition Conclusion
The rocket has exploded. The experiment has failed.

The first function is to indicate your conclusion based on your guess. With the example above, the context may be something like you try to launch a rocket in order to do a survey about Mars. Then, after you saw the explosion, you guessed the experiment failed. The phrase という sometimes appears before わけだ like 失敗したというわけだ. If that is the case, you don’t have to attach な to nouns and na-adjectives.

煙けむりが出ている。故こ障しょうの原因げんいんはエンジンというわけだ。
Smoke is coming out. The cause of the failure is in the engine.
田た中なかさんが怪我けがをした。つまり、試し合あいは私わたしたち次し第だいなわけだ。
Tanaka-san got injured. That is to say, the game depends on us.

The explanatory のだ has the function of indicating discovery. Thus, you can replace わけだ with のだ, but the nuance will be different.

故こ障しょうの原因げんいんはエンジンというわけだ。
(I’ve concluded) the cause of the failure is in the engine.
故こ障しょうの原因げんいんはエンジンなんだ。
(I’ve noticed) the cause of the failure is in the engine.

わけだ and のだ are sometimes used together, then the meaning is the same as わけだ. We don’t recommend doing so when you attach わけだ to nouns and na-adjectives. The multiple な makes sentences difficult to pronounce (*Look at the second example below).

故こ障しょうの原因げんいんはエンジンというわけなんだ。
(I’ve concluded) the cause of the failure is the engine.
試し合あいは私わたしたち次し第だいなわけなんだ。
(I’ve concluded) the game depends on us.

You can also use わけだ when responding. Phrases which are the counterpart to “that is to say” and “so that means” are often used together. つまり and ということは are one of the typical phrases.

明日あしたは9時くじに集しゅう合ごうよ。 => 一緒いっしょに勉べん強きょうをするわけだね。
[We] will gather at 900am tomorrow. => [we] will study together, right?
明日あしたは仕し事ごとを休やすむから。 => ということは、遊あそびに行いくわけだ。
[I] will be absent from work tomorrow. => That is to say, [you] will go hang out [right?]

Expressing “Makes Sense”

田た中なかさんは歌うたが本当ほんとうに上手うまい 歌か手しゅになるわけだ
Condition Conclusion
Tanaka-san is really good at singing. (It’s reasonable) [for him] to become a singer.

The second function is to express “makes sense.” English translations don’t work well here. With the above example, わけだ is used because you have fully understood why Tanaka-san has become a singer after hearing his song, like “The fact (that he has become a singer) makes sense to me now.” わけだ and the adverb 道どう理りで which indicates “no wonder” or “it’s reasonable that…” is often used together. In this context, という doesn’t appear.

窓まどが開あいている。道どう理りで部屋へやが寒さむいわけだ。
The window is open. No wonder it’s cold in the room.
 鈴すず木きさんの笑え顔がおは素す敵てきだね。子こ供どもから人にん気きがあるわけだ。
Suzuki-san’s smile is nice. (It’s reasonable) [he] is popular with children.
みんな練れん習しゅうをさぼっている。試し合あいに勝かてないわけだ。
Everyone neglects practice. (It’s reasonable) [we] cannot win games.

You cannot replace わけだ with のだ in this function. However, はずだ is interchangeable.

窓まどが開あいている。部屋へやが寒さむいはずだ。
The window is open. It should be cold in the room.
鈴すず木きさんの笑え顔がおは素す敵てきだね。子こ供どもから人にん気きがあるはずだ。
Suzuki-san’s smile is nice. It should be popular with children.
みんな練れん習しゅうをさぼっている。試し合あいに勝かてないはずだ。
Everyone neglects practice. So [we] should not win games.

Summary (Rewording)

明日あしたから仕し事ごとが始はじまる 夏なつ休やすみがもう終おわるわけだ
Condition Conclusion
[We] will start working tomorrow. Summer vacation is over soon.

The third function is to express summaries (rewording) just like のだ. You can roughly consider this as the equivalent to “in other words” in English. In this context, わけだ and のだ are interchangeable. 

子こ供どもが産うまれた。親おやになったわけだ。
[My] baby was born. In other words, [I] became a parent.
指ゆび輪わを渡わたされた。プロポーズされたわけだ。
[I] was given a ring. In other words, [I] was proposed to [by my partner].
ボブは引ひっ越こす。明日あしたからボブはいないわけだ。
Bob will move. In other words, [he] will not be [here] starting tomorrow.

Interrogative Sentences

Asking Whether You Can Conclude Something Based on a Guess

A. 飛ひ行こう機きに乗のったことがないん(だ / です)。
[I] have never tak en a flight.
B. ということは、海外かいがいに行いったことがないわけ(ですか)?
That is to say, you haven’t been abroad yet, right?

わけだ only works in the first function (Conclusions Based on a Guess) in affirmative sentences. It’s a very contextual question, which is to ask whether or not you can conclude something based on your guess. With the above example, you guessed that Mr. A has never been abroad based on the fact that he has never taken a flight and asked whether you can conclude that your guess is correct. Without such contexts, you cannot use わけだ in interrogative sentences.

A. ロケットの爆発ばくはつからいくつか発見はっけんが(あった / ありました)。
There are some discoveries from the explosion of the rocket.
B. 実験じっけんは失敗しっぱいじゃないわけ(ですか)?
(So that means) the experiment didn’t fail, right?

You can replace わけだ with のだ here.

海外かいがいに行いったことがない(んだ / んですか)?
失敗しっぱいじゃない(んだ / んですか)?

Negative Sentences

We showed you some negative sentences, e.g. 明日からボブはいないわけだ and 試合に勝てないわけだ. We have conjugated the verbs so far and they are plain negative sentences; however, you can actually conjugate わけだ like わけじゃない and わけがない and express various nuances in negative sentences. Let’s learn the sentence patterns.

…わけに(は・も)いかない: Improperness or Impossibility

[私わたしは] 人生じんせい を 諦あきらめるわけには(いかない / いきません)
[Topic / Subject] Direct Object Verb: Impossibility
[It’s not possible that] [I] give up [my] life.

This sentence pattern indicates improperness or impossibility like “it’s not proper that…” or “it’s not possible that…” In general, you need to use volitional verbs here. The three, which are わけに, わけには, and わけにも, have the same nuance.

約束やくそくを破やぶるわけに(いかない / いきません)。
[It’s not proper that] [I] broke a promise.
指示しじを無視むしするわけにも(いかない / いきません)。
[It’s not proper that] [I] neglect directions.
明日あしたは遅ち刻こくするわけには(いかない / いきません)。
[It’s not possible that] [I] will be late tomorrow.

…わけがない: Strong Negation

車くるまが 空そらを 飛とぶわけが(ない / ありません)
Subject Location to Pass Verb: Strong Negation
[It’s unreasonable that] cars fly in the sky.

This is related to the second function (Expressing “Make Sense”) in affirmative sentences and is roughly translated as “it’s unreasonable that…” or “there is no reason that…” Be careful. The level of negation is high.

こんな辛からい料りょう理りを食たべられるわけが(ない / ありません)。
[It’s unreasonable that] [I] can eat spicy foods like this.
3さんか月げつで日に本ほん語ごが身みにつくわけが(ない / ありません)。
[It’s unreasonable] to master Japanese within three months.

You can reword them by using はずがない.

こんな辛からい料りょう理りを食たべられるはずが(ない / ありません)。
[It shouldn’t be so that] [I] can eat spicy foods like this.
3さんか月げつで日に本ほん語ごが身みにつくはずが(ない / ありません)。
[It shouldn’t be so] to master Japanese within three months.

…わけではない: Denying Conclusions Based on a Guess

ロケットが爆発ばくはつしましたが、 実験じっけんは失敗しっぱいしたわけじゃ(ない / ありません)
Condition Conclusion
The rocket has exploded, but [it doesn’t mean] the experiment has failed.

…わけではない has two functions. One of the two is related to the first function in affirmative sentences (Conclusions Based on a Guess). With the above example, you deny people’s guess that the experiment has failed. You may consider this as the counterpart “it doesn’t mean” in English. There is a typical combination which is to utilize “…(だ)からといって: just because.”

本ほんが好すきだけど、毎日まいにち読よむわけじゃない(です)。
[I] like books, but [it doesn’t mean] [I] read [it] every day.
お金かね持もちだからといって、優やさしいわけじゃ(ない / ありません)。
Just because [people are] rich, [it doesn’t mean] [they are] kind.

The second function is related to partial negation. We will carefully pick it up in the next lesson.

Summary

  1. In affirmative sentences, the explanatory わけだ expresses;
    • conclusions based on a guess
    • "makes sense”
    • summaries (rewording)
  2. In interrogative sentences, the explanatory わけだ asks whether or not you can conclude based on your guess.
  3. In negative sentences, the explanatory わけだ expresses;
    • improperness or impossibility
    • strong negation
    • denying conclusions based on a guess

Now you know the two types of explanatory expressions. We hope that the functions are not difficult for you. As you can see the above, the explanatory わけだ has some very important roles in affirmative and negative sentences. In addition, わけだ is greatly involved with partial negatives. In the next lesson, you will learn more about negative sentences.